Forum Replies Created

  • John Trew

    Member
    January 12, 2026 at 3:36 pm in reply to: A kins domain village as official church

    I’ve been researching church structures for regenerative communities for about two years, and recently completed a three-part series exploring how these legal frameworks might protect kin domain settlements.

    What you’re describing in Portugal aligns with what I’ve been tracking and writing about on Substack: the 508(c)(1)(a) designation in the US (and similar structures in other countries) creates legal protection for communities organized around spiritual principles – including relationship with land, ancestral connection, and living outside conventional economic systems.

    The key insight isn’t just “use a church to avoid taxes.” It’s that these frameworks recognize spiritual authority as sovereign – which means communities can operate according to their own principles rather than state-defined categories.

    A few observations from my research:

    What actually works:

    • Churches that don’t register with the state (508(c)(1)(a) in the US, similar structures elsewhere)
    • Land held in perpetual trust by the spiritual body, not individuals
    • Governance based on coherent spiritual principles, not bylaws mimicking corporate structures

    What doesn’t work:

    • Using church structures purely as tax avoidance (courts see through this immediately)
    • Trying to retrofit spiritual language onto projects that are fundamentally real estate developments
    • Starting with tokenization or complex financial instruments before community coherence exists

    The RC movement specifically:

    I only encountered the Ringing Cedars books about a month ago, but it became immediately clear that the kin domain vision is already spiritual in nature – it just hasn’t been articulated in legal language that protects it.

    The vision Anastasia describes – family land held across generations, children born into continuity, ancestral memory embedded in place – this is not “alternative lifestyle.” It’s a cosmology with land practice. That means it can be legally protected as such.

    I wrote about this in the third article of my series here: https://trewregenerative.substack.com/p/the-bridge?r=64wpo

    But I want to be clear: the legal structure is secondary. The primary work is coherent community identity – knowing who you are together, what you’re protecting, and why it matters across generations.

    If that exists, the legal protection becomes straightforward. If it doesn’t exist, no legal structure will save it.

    I’d be interested in connecting with the Dutch group you mentioned to understand how they articulated their spiritual foundation and what’s actually working on the ground.